The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy
نویسندگان
چکیده
The rule of law is a cornerstone of contemporary constitutional democracy1 as was underscored by its role in cementing the recent transitions from authoritarian or totalitarian regimes2 to constitutional democracy in Eastern Europe and elsewhere.3 In the broadest terms, the rule of law requires that the state only subject the citizenry to publicly promulgated laws, that the state’s legislative function be separate from the adjudicative function, and that no one within the polity be above the law. The three essential characteristics of modern constitutionalism are limiting the powers of government, adherence to the rule of law, and protection of fundamental rights.4 In the absence of the rule of law, contemporary constitutional democracy would be impossible. Beyond that, however, it is not clear what precise characteristics the rule of law must possess to help sustain constitutional democracy, what specific role it must assume to
منابع مشابه
Relationship between the Rule of Law, Good Governance, and Sustainable Development
This paper reviews the relationship between the rule of law, good governance, and sustainable development as those terms are used by the relevant development organizations; describes the efforts made by various organizations to promote the rule of law and good governance; and addresses the need to strengthen compliance and enforcement for sustainable development. A recent movement, which has re...
متن کاملDiscourse Analysis of Iranian Intellectuals about Law on the Edge of Constitutional Revolution (Study of Mirza Malcom Khan and Mostashar al-Dowleh)
About 110 years ago, Iran experienced a revolution, which was known to be an attempt for development and modernization. The revolutionary roots had been established by new-coming social forces named as intellectuals. Since studying the past highlights the future, the necessity of intellectuals’ discourse as well as understanding their discourse strategies on the road to development and modernit...
متن کاملConstitutional Boundaries
Our large theme is failure and success in constitution making, or the limits of constitutional democracy. The convergence of recent scholarly work in political science and law and political events throughout the world make this a timely project inside and outside of the academy. The number of new constitutional texts written in support of regime formation in the past thirty years is astonishing...
متن کاملexamining the concept of a subset of institutions and monitor the quality of leadership in the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran
"Leadership Undertakings" is a term used in many common rules and is an exception to the rule. However, the definition and examples of this term are ambiguous and generally a broad interpretation is made of it. Whereas it is desirable, firstly, to adopt a specific criterion in the definition of these institutions in order to make it possible to account for its constituents and, secondly, to exc...
متن کاملRespect Worthy: Frank Michelman and the Legitimate Constitution
When people gather to celebrate the contributions of a preeminent scholar like Frank Michelman, the most likely focus of discussion will be the important papers that scholar wrote in years past that have helped define a field and have taken on a canonical status. Frank has certainly written his share of those, and in a number of different areas of legal study. But there is special enjoyment in ...
متن کامل